[nltk_data] Downloading package stopwords to /root/nltk_data... [nltk_data] Unzipping corpora/stopwords.zip.
This document processes the outputs of the praise reward system and performs an analysis of the resulting token reward distribution.
Since praise gets valued on a scale, we can take a look at how often each value of the scale gets assigned by quantifiers. Note: This metric disregards scores of praise marked as a duplicate, since the score of the original is already being taken into account.
The ten highest rated contributions for this round were the following:
| Avg. score | To | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 89.0 | karmaticacid#0 | for the MASSIVE work that went into reviewing all the sybil & fraud flags in the polygon QF round. it was a total mess w/ so many scam attempts, and we put so much work & really tried our best to get things to a good & accurate place |
| 84.6666666666667 | karmaticacid#0 | for jumping right in at the deadline and getting the octant updates into their forum. There was so miscomms between our fundraising team and her, but she didn't hesitate and as always got what was needed for the better good of Giveth into them. This will not happen again and the full handoff from her to the team is done! thanks again for "Just Doing It" 👟 |
| 82.0 | divine_comedian#0 | for all the work going into deprecating the GIVgarden - creating FE issues, rewriting documentation, setting up a multisig, setting up votes to move the GIVstream, setting up a vote to move the funds... it's so many steps and he's catherding & following advice process, and just making everything happen |
| 79.3333333333333 | griffgreen#0 | for finding LBANK and getting us a discount for the listing, yes $40K is a lot but the ROI is going to make that look like peanuts 🥜 |
| 73.3333333333333 | Amin#2164 | on identifying high level categories for loggin and suggesting urgency based log statements. This would serve as the initial high level solution which we will then improve based on observation. |
| 73.3333333333333 | karmaticacid#0 | for working together to get the final data out for the polygon round... honestly, we bit off more than we could chew with this one... there was A LOT of issues that we ran into, but you all powered thru it and got the data out. HUGE. |
| 73.3333333333333 | Amin#2164 | for deploying all of the staging and production contracts for making the necessary upgrades to our token distro on gnosis chain and optimism. |
| 73.3333333333333 | divine_comedian#0 | for preparing all email activities and journeys on the Ortto dashboard and creating a great spreadsheet as a reference for all API calls. His efforts provided splendid help to me. He prepared all email templates, API samples, and other stuff, allowing me to focus only on coding. Definitely I couldn't have completed the email service migration task without his help. |
| 70.6666666666667 | karmaticacid#0 | for these amazing working group leaders for writing up a detailed and insightful working group proposals for season 3!! 🌟🥳 It must have took time to write these proposals up, all the coordination with your team, and making sense of all these data. Not an easy task on top of actually leading the working groups! They really provided a well summarized performance report on the previous season, and all these exciting plans and core metrics in the next 3 months for Giveth! SO EXCITING 💜 |
| 70.6666666666667 | divine_comedian#0 | for always executing on the little and important things. Like adding our token info into the smoldapp token list, and all the other little things that would slip thru cracks if he didnt catch it. |
We can now take a look at the distribution of the received praise rewards. You can toggle the inclusion of the different sources by clicking on the legend.
We can also take a look at the amount of praise different users gave.
Now for something more fun: let's surface the top "praise flows" from the data. Thanks to @inventandchill for this awesome visualization! On one side we have the top 15 praise givers separately, on the other the top 25 receivers. The people outside the selection get aggregated into the "REST FROM" and "REST TO" categories.
Now let's take a closer look at the quantification process and the quantifiers:
To aid the revision process, we highlight disagreements between quantifiers.
This graphic visualizes controversial praise ratings by sorting them by the "spread" between the highest and lowest received score.
Please keep in mind that this is a visual aid. If there are several praise instances with similar spread and quant score, all but one end up "hidden" on the chart. For an exhaustive list, take a look at the exported file "praise_outliers.csv" .
Let's see how different quantifiers behaved by showing the range of praise scores they gave.
To interpret the box plot:
Bottom horizontal line of box plot is minimum value
First horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is First quartile or 25%
Second horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is Second quartile or 50% or median.
Third horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is third quartile or 75%
Top horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is maximum value.
Among 328 praises, 41 (12.50%) do not agree on duplication
Praise instances with disagreements in duplication are collected in 'results/duplication_examination.csv'. To compare, look at the last 4 columns: 'DUPLICATE MSG 1/2/3' and 'ORIGINAL MSG'.
Among 328 praises, 0 (0.00%) do not agree on dismissal
Praise instances with disagreements in dismissal are collected in'results/dismissal_disaggreed.csv'. You can further look into who dismissed and who did not.